Hier ein neuer Test mit den Kontrahenten:
**Match**: **J13.B2-136 vs 61984 in time control.**
**LC0 version:** 0.23.2
**LC0 options:** cudnn-fp16, demux
- For J13B.2-136: old CCC settings : cpuct=3.4, cpuct-base=10000, cpuct-factor=2.30, fpu=1.1
- For 61984: <@!115054542860713989> "bonus" tune: cpuct=2.147, fpu=0.443, pst=1.607, cpuct-base=18368, cpuct-factor=2.815
**Time control:** 10s+1s
**Hardware:** 2xRTX 2070
**Book:** CCC 12 book (100 openings), in sequence, reversed color
**Tablebases:** 6-man TB
**Adjudication**: 6-man TB, -draw movenumber=50 movecount=5 score=8 -resign movecount=5 score=800
**Software:**cutechess-cli
**Speed:** Benchmark in this settings (10s): J13B.2-160: 22.7 knps, 61984: 20.2 knps
**Comments:** 61984 wins again vs J13B.2-166 in old CCC settings with +32 elo (+32 -14 =154). Congrats for who voted for it (vote B) <
https://discordapp.com/channels/425419482568196106/539960268982059008/666939850959880192>. So even new "bonus" settings is better than the old CCC settings for J13B.2-136 in this test. I think the "bonus" settings is safe to play in CCC for T60. J13B.2-136, despite losing, can complain that there is no settings optimized for it.
```diff
tc=10s+1s, 2 x RTX 2070, demux,
no mention: "bonus settings" cpuct=2.147, fpu=0.443, pst=1.607, cpuct-base=18368, cpuct-factor=2.815
oldCCC: cpuct=3.4, fpu=1.1, cpuct-base=10000, cpuct-factor=2.30
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) CFS(%) W D L
- 1 lc0.net.61984 : 0 ---- 211.0 400 52.8 71 62 298 40
2 lc0.net.J13B.2-136 : -7 25 98.0 200 49.0 93 26 144 30
+ 3 lc0.net.J13B.2-136.oldCCC : -32 25 91.0 200 45.5 --- 14 154 32
```