Not logged inCSS-Forum
Forum CSS-Online Help Search Login
CSS-Shop Impressum Datenschutz
Up Topic Hauptforen / CSS-Forum / Studie
- - By Gerhard Josten Date 2011-06-20 14:15
Hallo!
In der aktuellen Ausgabe 6/2011 der Zeitschrift "Schach" erschien diese Studie:

Weiß am Zug gewinnt.
Wie lange brauche eure Rechner, um den Gewinn anzuzeigen?
Parent - By Werner Preuss Date 2011-06-20 19:54
[quote="Gerhard Josten"]
Wie lange brauche eure Rechner, um den Gewinn anzuzeigen?
[/quote]

Shredder12 schafft es auch auf alter hardware ganz fix.
Nach weniger als einer Minute hat er 1.c3 Kb3 2.Ta1 usw.
anfangs mit 0.00 später mit > 6 BE.
Andere Engines tun sich da schwerer.

Gruß
W
Parent - - By Anton Stadlhofer Date 2011-06-20 21:19
Hallo

NN - _, Studie, Bc3 2011

Analysis by Deep Fritz 10:

1.c3+ Kb3 2.Lxc4+ Kxc4 3.b3+ Kd3 4.Tb2 Dxg6 5.Td2+ Ke4 6.Tf2 c6 7.Sb2 Dg3 8.Te2+ Kf5
  -+  (-1.61)   Tiefe: 8/32   00:00:00  296kN
  -+  (-2.96)   Tiefe: 12/50   00:00:01  15059kN
1.Ta1 Dxd4 2.Lxc4 Df4+ 3.Kb1 dxc4 4.Ta4+ Kb5 5.Sc3+ Ka6 6.Ka2 Dxh4 7.g7 Dg4
  -+  (-2.96)   Tiefe: 12/50   00:00:01  15768kN
  -+  (-2.84)   Tiefe: 12/50   00:00:01  16048kN
1.Se3 Dxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Sxc4 Dg1+ 4.Kc2 Dxg2+ 5.Sd2 b5 6.g7 Dxg7 7.Lc8 Dg6+ 8.Kc1 a4 9.Lb7 Df6 10.Kc2 Df5+ 11.Kc1 Df6
  -+  (-2.84)   Tiefe: 12/50   00:00:01  16366kN
  -+  (-3.19)   Tiefe: 19/42   00:00:10  159mN
1.c3!!+ Kb3 2.Ta1 Ta4 3.Txa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 Dxg6+ 5.Ka2 Dc2 6.Se3 Db3+ 7.Kb1 c5 8.Sc2 Db5 9.Lxb5+ Kxb5 10.Se3 cxd4 11.cxd4 Kc6 12.Sf5 a4 13.Sxh6
  -+  (-3.18)   Tiefe: 19/42   00:00:13  206mN
  +-  (3.54)   Tiefe: 22/60   00:00:45  825mN, tb=4

lg    Anton
Parent - By Günter Müller Date 2011-06-21 00:52
Hier die Single Version Fritz 10 zum genießen

6/2011 der Zeitschrift "Schach
8/2p3q1/Bp4Pp/p2p3p/1krP3P/8/1PP3P1/1RKN4 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Fritz 10:

1.Ne3 Qxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Nxc4 Qg1+ 4.Kc2 Qxg2+ 5.Nd2 b5 6.g7 Qxg7 7.Bb7 Qg6+ 8.Kc1
  -+  (-2.55)   Depth: 16/16   00:00:00  0kN
1.Ne3 Qxd4
  -+  (-2.83)   Depth: 17/43   00:00:02  3392kN
1.Ne3 Qxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Nxc4 Qg1+ 4.Kc2 Qxg2+ 5.Nd2 b5 6.g7 Qxg7 7.Bc8 Qg6+ 8.Kc1 a4 9.Bb7 Qg3 10.Kc2 Qxh4 11.Rf1 c6
  -+  (-3.14)   Depth: 17/43   00:00:05  8839kN
1.Ne3 Qxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Nxc4 Qg1+ 4.Kc2 Qxg2+ 5.Nd2 b5 6.g7 Qxg7 7.Bc8 Qg6+ 8.Kd1 a4 9.Rc1 Qg3 10.Kc2 Qxh4 11.Rf1
  -+  (-3.24)   Depth: 18/43   00:00:24  37120kN
1.Ne3 Qxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Nxc4 Qg1+ 4.Kc2 Qxg2+ 5.Nd2 b5 6.g7 Qxg7 7.Bc8 Qg6+ 8.Kd1 a4 9.Rc1 Qg3 10.Kc2 Qxh4 11.Rf1
  -+  (-3.24)   Depth: 19/47   00:01:00  93474kN
1.Ne3
  -+  (-2.96)   Depth: 20/47   00:02:31  238mN
1.c3+
  -+  (-2.96)   Depth: 20/47   00:03:38  342mN
1.c3+
  -+  (-2.80)   Depth: 20/47   00:03:39  344mN
1.c3+
  -+  (-2.49)   Depth: 20/47   00:03:40  345mN
1.c3+
  -+  (-1.86)   Depth: 20/47   00:03:44  352mN
1.c3+ Kb3 2.Ra1 Ra4 3.Rxa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 c5 5.Ka2 c4 6.Ne3 Qxg6 7.Nxd5 Qc6 8.Nf4 Qc7 9.Nd5 Qc6
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 20/47   00:03:58  374mN
1.c3+ Kb3 2.Ra1 Ra4 3.Rxa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 c5 5.Ka2 c4 6.Ne3 Qxg6 7.Nxd5 Qc6 8.Nf4 b5 9.Nd3 b4 10.Nc5+ Qxc5
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 21/47   00:05:10  486mN
1.c3+
  +/=  (0.28)   Depth: 22/47   00:07:11  676mN
1.c3+
  +/=  (0.56)   Depth: 22/47   00:07:18  686mN
1.c3+
  +/-  (1.13)   Depth: 22/47   00:07:23  695mN
1.c3+ Kb3 2.Ra1 Ra4 3.Rxa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 Qxg6+ 5.Ka2 Qc2 6.Ne3 Qb3+
  +-  (3.27)   Depth: 22/59   00:08:35  809mN
1.c3+ Kb3 2.Ra1 Ra4 3.Rxa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 Qxg6+ 5.Ka2 Qc2 6.Ne3 Qb3+ 7.Kb1 c5 8.Nc2 Qb5 9.Bxb5+ Kxb5 10.Ne3 cxd4 11.cxd4 Kc6 12.Nf5 a4
  +-  (3.54)   Depth: 23/52   00:13:58  1320mN
Parent - - By Anton Stadlhofer Date 2011-06-20 21:22
Hallo

und noch eine Engine......

NN - _, Studie, Bc3
8/2p3q1/Bp4Pp/p2p3p/1krP3P/8/1PP3P1/1RKN4 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Houdini 1.5 x64:

1.Se3 Dxd4 2.c3+ Kc5 3.Sxc4 Dg1+ 4.Kc2 Dxg2+ 5.Sd2 b5 6.g7 Dg6+ 7.Kc1 Dxg7 8.Lc8 c6 9.Kd1 Dg1+ 10.Ke2 Dh2+ 11.Kd3 Dg3+ 12.Kc2 Dg6+ 13.Kd1 a4 14.Kc1 Kb6 15.Ld7 Kc7 16.Lh3 Dg3 17.Lf5 Dxh4 18.Kc2 Dg3 19.Tf1 h4 20.Th1 Df2 21.Tf1 Dg2
  =/+  (-0.62)   Tiefe: 6/17   00:00:00  3kN
  -+  (-2.28)   Tiefe: 20/52   00:00:05  58721kN
1.c3!!+ Kb3 2.Ta1 Ta4 3.Txa4 Kxa4 4.Kb1 Dxg6+ 5.Ka2 Dc2 6.Se3 Db3+ 7.Kb1 c6 8.Ld3 c5 9.Lc2 cxd4 10.cxd4 Kb4 11.Lxb3 Kxb3 12.Sxd5 Kc4 13.Sxb6+ Kxd4 14.Kc2 Kc5 15.Sd7+ Kd5 16.Sf6+ Ke6 17.Sxh5 Kf5 18.Sg3+ Kg4 19.Se2 a4 20.Sc3 Kxh4 21.Sxa4 Kg3 22.b4 Kf4 23.b5 Ke5 24.Kc3 Kd5 25.Kb4 Kd6 26.Sc5 Kc7
  -+  (-2.01)   Tiefe: 20/52   00:00:05  60150kN
  +-  (5.03)   Tiefe: 23/67   00:00:11  173mN

lg        Anton
Parent - By Gerhard Josten Date 2011-06-20 22:46
Hallo Anton!
Schöner ist aber dieses Abspiel mit dem stillen Schluss:
1. c3+ Kb3 2. Ra1 Ra4 3. Rxa4 Kxa4 4. Kb1 c5 5. Ka2 c4 6. Ne3 Qxg6 7. Nxc4 dxc4 8. Bxc4 Qc2 9. g3 gewinnt. Oder?
Gerhard
Up Topic Hauptforen / CSS-Forum / Studie

Powered by mwForum 2.29.3 © 1999-2014 Markus Wichitill