Stockfish 1.9 JA against Naum 4.2Place | Engine | Author | Country | Points | Single results | 1 | Stockfish 1.9 JA | T. Romstad, M. Costalba, J. Kiiski | | 51.5/100 | 0½1½½110½½-10½½1½10½1-½½1½010½½½-111101½0½0-11000½1½0½- 0½½01½1110-½½½0½0½110-½½½11½00½0-1½000011½½-0½½½1½½½1½ |
2 | Naum 4.2 | Aleksandar Naumov | | 48.5/100 | 1½0½½001½½-01½½0½01½0-½½0½101½½½-000010½1½1-00111½0½1½- 1½½10½0001-½½½1½1½001-½½½00½11½1-0½111100½½-1½½½0½½½0½ |
.
100 of
100 matches played.
Stockfish 1.9 JA v/s Naum 4.2 (100: + 30,= 43,- 27)
Start of tournament: ......... 2010.10.04, 22:11:12
Town/ Country: .............. Dax, France
Level: ............................ Blitz 40/1' repeated
Hardware: ...................... Intel® Pentium® Dual CPU T2370
Engines: ......................... Naum 4.2 / Stockfish 1.9 JA
both 32-bit using one threadHash: ............................. 64 MB / 64 MB
GUI: ............................... Shredder Classic 3
OS: ................................ Windows Seven
Ultimate Ponder OFFNalimov TB ..................... 3+4+5
Book: .............................
Shredder book, stopped using after 5 moves.
Openings: ....................... 50 different openings randomly chosen by GUI, large mode.
Compare this score to this last one : Stockfish 1.7 JA v/s Naum 4.2 (100: + 33,= 38,- 29)
But who's better in MP and longer time control ?Best regards,
Orlando