Langsames python Programm schlägt Fruit 2.1

By dkappe Date 2020-05-02 05:14

Fruit war mal das stärkste program überhaupt das für viel Aufsehen gesorgt hat. Und jetzt hat ein lahmes Python Programm es geschlagen. (3+2, noomen 3, keine egtb)

https://github.com/dkappe/a0lite

Code:


   # PLAYER         :  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)  CFS(%)    W    D    L  D(%)
   1 A0Lite-Best    :      46     54    56.5     100  56.5      95   38   37   25  37.0
   2 Fruit-2.1      :       0   ----    43.5     100  43.5     ---   25   37   38  37.0

White advantage = -10.70 +/- 29.80
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 37.54 % +/- 4.91

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2020.04.30"] [Round "15"] [White "A0Lite-Best"] [Black "Fruit-2.1"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A00"] [GameDuration "00:08:51"] [GameEndTime "2020-04-30T23:23:42.458 CDT"] [GameStartTime "2020-04-30T23:14:50.855 CDT"] [Opening "Dunst (Sleipner, Heinrichsen) Opening"] [PlyCount "120"] [Termination "adjudication"] [TimeControl "180+2"]  1. Nc3 {book} c5 {book} 2. Nf3 {book} d5 {book} 3. e4 {book} d4 {book} 4. Bb5+ {+0.04/1 16s} Nd7 {-0.34/13 6.4s} 5. Ne2 {+0.17/1 8.1s} Nf6 {-0.42/13 7.5s} 6. e5 {+0.15/1 8.0s} Qa5 {-0.19/13 5.3s} 7. a4 {+0.46/1 8.6s} a6 {-0.25/14 7.2s} 8. Bc4 {+0.38/1 5.5s} Nb6 {-0.32/13 7.5s} 9. Bb3 {+0.32/1 11s} Nfd5 {-0.11/13 4.5s} 10. O-O {+0.31/1 5.0s} c4 {-0.15/14 6.8s} 11. Ba2 {+0.31/1 3.6s} d3 {-0.26/14 6.5s} 12. cxd3 {+0.26/1 5.1s} cxd3 {-0.26/13 6.5s} 13. Nc3 {+0.27/1 2.4s} Nb4 {-0.29/14 6.3s} 14. e6 {+0.04/1 5.3s} fxe6 {-0.26/13 4.4s} 15. Re1 {+0.04/1 5.1s} N6d5 {0.00/13 6.1s} 16. Ne5 {+0.39/1 6.4s} Nc2 {+0.74/11 3.9s} 17. Nxd5 {+0.48/1 5.1s} exd5 {+0.70/12 5.9s} 18. b4 {+0.59/1 4.0s} Qc7 {+0.44/12 4.1s} 19. Qf3 {+0.60/1 9.7s} Nxe1 {+0.32/12 7.6s} 20. Qf7+ {+0.65/1 3.0s} Kd8 {+1.21/4 0.003s} 21. Bb2 {+0.60/1 9.3s} e6 {+0.05/12 5.1s} 22. Rxe1 {+0.55/1 1.1s} Bxb4 {-0.08/12 8.7s} 23. Qf4 {+1.47/1 4.9s} Bd6 {-0.08/12 5.3s} 24. Nf7+ {+1.65/1 3.7s} Kd7 {-0.41/12 4.2s} 25. Qg4 {+1.75/1 4.7s} Re8 {-0.41/11 5.1s} 26. Bxd5 {+1.72/1 3.5s} Re7 {-1.24/10 3.7s} 27. Nxd6 {+1.63/1 2.3s} Qxd6 {-0.96/10 2.0s} 28. Bf3 {+1.60/1 3.1s} Rf7 {-0.95/12 5.0s} 29. Bxg7 {+2.08/1 5.9s} Rf4 {-1.42/11 12s} 30. Qh3 {+2.14/1 6.6s} Qe7 {-1.63/11 5.0s} 31. Be5 {+2.31/1 5.0s} Rh4 {-2.37/11 5.8s} 32. Qg3 {+2.91/1 3.9s} Rc4 {-2.47/12 3.7s} 33. Bh5 {+3.66/1 6.2s} Rc5 {-2.71/12 5.2s} 34. Qxd3+ {+2.81/1 6.1s} Rd5 {-2.92/12 3.7s} 35. Qg3 {+2.32/1 4.7s} Rc5 {-2.87/12 5.3s} 36. d4 {+3.21/1 5.0s} Rc4 {-3.99/13 16s} 37. Qg8 {+3.57/1 5.6s} b5 {-2.63/12 8.6s} 38. d5 {+2.76/1 3.3s} Bb7 {-2.99/11 4.8s} 39. dxe6+ {+2.34/1 2.0s} Kc6 {-2.89/11 2.2s} 40. Qf7 {+3.10/1 3.1s} Qxf7 {-2.99/11 3.0s} 41. exf7 {+2.65/1 3.7s} Kb6 {-3.20/11 2.2s} 42. axb5 {+2.69/1 4.9s} axb5 {-3.13/11 2.2s} 43. Bg7 {+2.55/1 4.5s} Rcc8 {-3.17/12 3.3s} 44. g4 {+2.63/1 4.6s} b4 {-2.26/11 3.9s} 45. g5 {+1.86/1 4.3s} Bd5 {-2.36/11 3.8s} 46. f4 {+2.01/1 3.7s} b3 {-2.00/10 2.3s} 47. Rd1 {+1.81/1 2.8s} Kc5 {-1.95/11 4.2s} 48. Kf2 {+1.92/1 4.0s} Rf8 {-1.19/10 3.8s} 49. Rc1+ {+1.21/1 3.1s} Kb4 {-0.82/11 2.0s} 50. Bxf8+ {+0.98/1 3.6s} Rxf8 {-0.12/12 1.2s} 51. f5 {+0.95/1 1.1s} Bxf7 {0.00/14 1.9s} 52. Bxf7 {+0.94/1 0.85s} Rxf7 {+0.99/14 1.3s} 53. f6 {+0.91/1 0.50s} b2 {+1.20/15 3.0s} 54. Rb1 {+1.15/1 1.2s} Kc3 {+1.09/14 2.3s} 55. h4 {+1.63/1 3.6s} Kc2 {+0.83/14 2.7s} 56. Rxb2+ {+1.57/1 1.8s} Kxb2 {+0.42/14 0.73s} 57. Kf3 {+1.39/1 3.4s} Kc2 {0.00/16 2.1s} 58. Ke4 {+1.87/1 2.5s} Kd2 {0.00/16 3.2s} 59. h5 {+1.93/1 3.5s} h6 {-4.60/17 12s} 60. Kf5 {+1.88/1 1.9s} hxg5 {-4.76/17 1.7s, White wins by adjudication: SyzygyTB} 1-0

Event:

Ort:

Datum:

Weiss:

Schwarz:

Ergebnis

Board