So, die Filterung (habe doch 10 Minuten pro Stellung genommen, wie gehabt, Komodo Eval-Intervall [-0.50;+0.60]) und die Testruns der Gambit-Eröffnungen (217 Stellungen blieben übrig) und die der KönigsInder-Eröffnungen (256 Stellungen blieben übrig) sind nun durch.
Download hier (alle J.Noomen Sets, also die gesammelten TCEC Superfinal-Eröffnungen, die Gambit-Eröffnungen und die Königsinder-Eröffnungen sind im Download enthalten):
https://www.sp-cc.de/files/jn_openings.zipIm Gegensatz zu den TCEC-Superfinal Eröffnungen, verliefen die Testruns der Gambit- und der Königsinder-Eröffnungen ziemlich ernüchternd, was Remisqouten und Ergebnisspreizung angeht:
(Auszug aus der ReadMe-Datei)
All games played with 5'+3'' (average game-duration: 15-16 minutes)
Singlecore, 256MB Hash, no endgame-bases, no ponder
both engines with Contempt=+15, LittleBlitzerGUI
Score is the result of asmFish 170426 - Komodo 10.4. Example:
Score 60.3% – 39.7% means, that asmFish scored 60.3% and Komodo scored 39.7%
Here the results of some of my older testruns, which I did for the
development of my SALC and Drawkiller openings:
Each testrun 1000 games:
SF-Framework standard 8 move openings: Score 60.3% – 39.7%, draws: 63.4%
FEOBOS v20 contempt 5: Score 58.7% - 41.3%, draws: 64.1%
HERT 500: Score: 60.6% - 39.4%, draws: 60.4%
4 GM-moves short book: Score 60.5% - 39.5%, draws: 57.1%
SALC V5 full-closed 500 positions: Score 66.5% - 33.5%, draws: 47.7%
Drawkiller (small 500 positions set): Score: 66.4% - 33.6%, draws 30.5%
Here the result of the testrun of the TCEC Superfinal openings Season 9-15):
TCEC Superfinal openings (Season 9-15) edited (237 lines, 474 games):
Score: 62.5% - 37.5%, draws: 50.4%As you can see, the result is better, than the results of the other
"classical" openings (SF-8moves, FEOBOS, HERT and 4 GM-moves). And
not so far away from the result of my SALC openings. Which is really
impressive. Of course, Drawkiller is out of reach and in its own
dimension...
*****************************************************************************
Here the results of the testruns with the (edited) Gambit-openings and the
KingsIndian-openings:
Gambit-openings (edited) (217 lines, 434 games):
Score: 60.1% - 39.9%, draws: 63.6%KingsIndian-openings (edited) (256 lines, 512 games):
Score: 60.8% - 39.2%, draws: 57.6%
As you can see, the Gambit-openings give no better statistics than the classical
opening-sets (SF-Framework, FEOBOS) - little disappointing.
The KingsIndian openings statistics are on a level with the 4 GM-moves short
openings.
Both are clearly worse, than the TCEC Superfinal openings by J.Noomen.